VFR vs RVF linkages

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Post Reply
fastdruid
Regular Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:39 pm
VFR vs RVF linkages

Post by fastdruid »

Hmmm, seems the RVF chassis that's going to be our track bike has what appears to be a VFR linkage, or at least the triangle linkage bit.

When I dismantled it I thought that the solidness of the smallest of the three pivot points was because it had seized and ordered the bearings/seals I needed accordingly. Come taking it out though I realised its a bush and looking at the microfiches shows that the VFR has a bush instead of a bearing there.

So onto the question, is there actually any differences in rate between the NC30 and NC35 linkages? If there is which is best (for track use), its worth mentioning that the tie-arms have also been shortened on this bike, i don't know if that makes any difference.

Druid
Gazzahh
Settled in member
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:53 pm
Bike owned: NC30 MV F4 Kwak Z900
Location: Darley Dale, Derbyshire
Re: VFR vs RVF linkages

Post by Gazzahh »

Sounds about right, 35`s should have bearings in all three points on the trianle and a shorter dogbone to give correct geomety for the 17" wheel
fastdruid
Regular Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:39 pm
Re: VFR vs RVF linkages

Post by fastdruid »

Gazzahh wrote:Sounds about right, 35`s should have bearings in all three points on the trianle and a shorter dogbone to give correct geomety for the 17" wheel
So it's def a NC30/VFR triangle as I thought then, the dogbone/tiebar has been cut and welded, as the oil seals are larger on the NC30 for the tiebar/dogbones I can tell it's an NC30 tie bar too, any idea what the std length is for the NC35 tie bars/dogbones? These appear to be about 103mm centre to centre.

Are there any differences apart from the bearings in the triangle?

Druid
fastdruid
Regular Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:39 pm
Re: VFR vs RVF linkages

Post by fastdruid »

Infact does anyone have a NC35 'triangle' and/or dogbones/tiebars they could measure, all I need are the three measurements for the hole centres on the triangle then I can model it and see what difference it makes.

I really don't want to tear the road bike apart just to measure the suspension. :/

The NC30 one is 71/89.5/72mm fwiw.

Druid
Gazzahh
Settled in member
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:53 pm
Bike owned: NC30 MV F4 Kwak Z900
Location: Darley Dale, Derbyshire
Re: VFR vs RVF linkages

Post by Gazzahh »

Triange dimensions are the same on both models, I can get you the center measurments for the NC35 dogbone tomorrow?
fastdruid
Regular Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:39 pm
Re: VFR vs RVF linkages

Post by fastdruid »

Gazzahh wrote:Triange dimensions are the same on both models, I can get you the center measurments for the NC35 dogbone tomorrow?
Fantastic, that changes it from a "I need to change it" to "if i spot one cheap on ebay I'll get it", if you could please get the std measurments that would be great.

Druid
Gazzahh
Settled in member
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:53 pm
Bike owned: NC30 MV F4 Kwak Z900
Location: Darley Dale, Derbyshire
Re: VFR vs RVF linkages

Post by Gazzahh »

I got one last week for my NC30 off ebay for £9.99, I`ve been after one for a while, good luck with your Search, I`ll post the dimensions tomorrow.
Gazzahh
Settled in member
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:53 pm
Bike owned: NC30 MV F4 Kwak Z900
Location: Darley Dale, Derbyshire
Re: VFR vs RVF linkages

Post by Gazzahh »

NC35 Dogbone linkage centers are 108mm
duh_ave
Settled in member
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 12:00 am
Re: VFR vs RVF linkages

Post by duh_ave »

the rvf link is 5mm shorter than the vfr link.
On a VFR, using the rvf link adds 15mm of ride height.
I cannot see any advantage to using a VFR link on a RVF.

Post Reply