NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
J.B.
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:08 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by J.B. » Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:01 pm

Hi all,

I have the carbs for the new track bike in pieces. Can someone please confirm how many pairs of holes the standard NC35 carb emulsion tubes have? I mean the brass tubes that the main jet screws into.

In my spares box I've amassed different tubes with 3,4 & 5 pairs of holes - I'm pretty sure standard is 3, just want to confirm.

Cheers,

Jimmy

911f
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:39 am
Bike owned: 96 rvf400
Location: Minnesota USA

Re: NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by 911f » Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:47 pm

are you referring to the tube that holds the main jet? just want to be sure we are talking about the same thing. I have mine apart now, so let me know if not. It has 3 pairs of holes - 2 closer together and the third spaced a little further away (relative to the float chamber. Let me know if not what you are talking about.

J.B.
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:08 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Re: NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by J.B. » Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:31 pm

Yeah that's the one - thanks!

J.B.
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:08 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Re: NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by J.B. » Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:55 pm

I checked the parts microfiche - the emulsion tubes for the front and rear pairs of carbs have different part numbers. Can some one please confirm what the differences between them are?

Thanks in advance.

911f
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:39 am
Bike owned: 96 rvf400
Location: Minnesota USA

Re: NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by 911f » Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:43 pm

I did not even think that. On my vtr1000 they are indeed different front to back - the holes are at different levels. I just grabbed one of the nc35 and reported that to you - but didn't look to see if front to back were different. I still have the carbs off the bike and would just have to take the bowl off and can check later today if nobody has responded before then.

911f
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:39 am
Bike owned: 96 rvf400
Location: Minnesota USA

Re: NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by 911f » Sun Aug 30, 2009 4:08 pm

here they are. sorry for crappy pics, used cell phone. but they are different. both have 3 sets of holes but different spacing:

front : highest hole much further away from the lower pair (away from main jet)
rear: highest hole closer to lowest pair - almost evenly spaced.

Image

Image

if you need more let me know

bill

J.B.
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:08 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Re: NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by J.B. » Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:05 pm

Thank you again sir ... :worthy:

You have a PM

Jimmy

911f
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:39 am
Bike owned: 96 rvf400
Location: Minnesota USA

Re: NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by 911f » Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:08 pm

If anyone else has the NC35 carbs apart, please weigh in on this. The bike is new to me and the first time I had the carbs off the bike. I do not know if a Previous owner had them apart or was careful to get things back in the correct order obviously I have no way of knowing that and I doubt most people would notice front to rear differences unless clued into it.

User avatar
Cammo
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 4505
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:35 am
Bike owned: NC30
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by Cammo » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:37 pm

The labelled pics above are correct.
"It's just a ride" Bill Hicks

Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954

Re: NC35 Emulsion Tubes

Post by Neosophist » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:52 pm

Stickshift wrote:The labelled pics above are correct.
:up:
JB wrote:I checked the parts microfiche - the emulsion tubes for the front and rear pairs of carbs have different part numbers. Can some one please confirm what the differences between them are?

Thanks in advance.
The rears get warmer due to less air flow so are run slightly richer than the front (hence the hole differences)
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...

Post Reply