Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
code2006
Settled in member
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:10 pm
Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by code2006 »

Hi guys I have a spare set of carbs and I was going to put my new jets in there (112) and service the carb( make sure it's clean ect ect) and then swap the carbs on my bike

Anyway as I took the jet out it said 116 so I thought maybe some one changed the jets
Took the front emulsion tube and it looked different from ones that r in cammos diy guide mine has 3 holes so that's 6 holes in total and cammos pic has 4 on front and 5 on rear

So all the jets on this carb are 116, all 4 emulsion tubes have 3 holes so 6 in total, and the pilot jets have 2 holes 8 holes in total per jet and they r size 35
I have another spare set of carbs so I'm going to strip them down as well but does any one know y this carb is different? I have uploaded pics
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Thanks Alex
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by Neosophist »

I don't know if there 'wrong' but they don't look like the standard Honda ones.

Have you run those carbs?

Those look like the big Keihin jets.. there longer than the standard honda ones by 1.4mm...

If they went to the trouble of changing the emulsion tubes to get the fuelling good sounds like they would have been a well setup set.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
code2006
Settled in member
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:10 pm
Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by code2006 »

Neosophist wrote:I don't know if there 'wrong' but they don't look like the standard Honda ones.

Have you run those carbs?

Those look like the big Keihin jets.. there longer than the standard honda ones by 1.4mm...

If they went to the trouble of changing the emulsion tubes to get the fuelling good sounds like they would have been a well setup set.
Na the carbs were on the engine I bought from eBay
samace
Settled in member
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:05 pm
Re: Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by samace »

code2006 wrote:Hi guys I have a spare set of carbs and I was going to put my new jets in there (112) and service the carb( make sure it's clean ect ect) and then swap the carbs on my bike

Anyway as I took the jet out it said 116 so I thought maybe some one changed the jets
Took the front emulsion tube and it looked different from ones that r in cammos diy guide mine has 3 holes so that's 6 holes in total and cammos pic has 4 on front and 5 on rear

So all the jets on this carb are 116, all 4 emulsion tubes have 3 holes so 6 in total, and the pilot jets have 2 holes 8 holes in total per jet and they r size 35
I have another spare set of carbs so I'm going to strip them down as well but does any one know y this carb is different? I have uploaded pics
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Thanks Alex
Just stripped my carbs also the emulsion tubes are the same as mine pilot jets are also saome but have 108 main jets whish is ok for standard exhaust. your main jets seem different have you different exhaust/intake system from standard ?
code2006
Settled in member
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:10 pm
Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by code2006 »

samace wrote:
code2006 wrote:Hi guys I have a spare set of carbs and I was going to put my new jets in there (112) and service the carb( make sure it's clean ect ect) and then swap the carbs on my bike

Anyway as I took the jet out it said 116 so I thought maybe some one changed the jets
Took the front emulsion tube and it looked different from ones that r in cammos diy guide mine has 3 holes so that's 6 holes in total and cammos pic has 4 on front and 5 on rear

So all the jets on this carb are 116, all 4 emulsion tubes have 3 holes so 6 in total, and the pilot jets have 2 holes 8 holes in total per jet and they r size 35
I have another spare set of carbs so I'm going to strip them down as well but does any one know y this carb is different? I have uploaded pics
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Thanks Alex
Just stripped my carbs also the emulsion tubes are the same as mine pilot jets are also saome but have 108 main jets whish is ok for standard exhaust. your main jets seem different have you different exhaust/intake system from standard ?
Now yes I have full tyga system
But the carbs were taken off an engine I bought from eBay
User avatar
Cammo
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 4505
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:35 am
Bike owned: NC30
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by Cammo »

Alex: I don't know that those emulsion tubes are different from standard, I've never looked inside rvf carbs. The vfr emulsion tubes (pics in the guide) are different to rvf items.

They are aftermarket jets though.
"It's just a ride" Bill Hicks
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by Neosophist »

Oh it's an RVF... hmm i'll have to have a look later :-)

Could be standard.. Jets as cammo said are defo not tho.. there the 'big ones' by the looks of them.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
User avatar
Speedy
NWAA Supporter
NWAA Supporter
Posts: 483
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:29 pm
Bike owned: RVF400RR, ER6n
Location: Middx, U.K.
Re: Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by Speedy »

I had mine in my hands only yesterday, but can only be 90% sure (terrible memory :roll: ) that those emulsion tubes (needle jet holders) are the same as mine, which should mean they are the standard RVF400 units!
The same goes to the Pilot Jets, standard 35's!
Looks like only the main jets were changed, possibly to suit an aftermarket zorst & maybe different air filter too!

P.s. My carbs are still not fitted, so if you need confirmation of what's on my carbs I can open them up and take a photo or two!

NOTE: Just checked the parts manual and it shows 2 different part numbers for the emulsion tubes - 16165-MR8-900 for cylinders 2&4 (front ones) and 16166-MR8-900 for cylinders 1&3 (rear ones)!
This must mean that they're actually different in some way!? Will have to get mine off again to confirm it!!!...
When the mind is relaxed, the body will go faster! 8-)
code2006
Settled in member
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:10 pm
Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by code2006 »

Speedy wrote:I had mine in my hands only yesterday, but can only be 90% sure (terrible memory :roll: ) that those emulsion tubes (needle jet holders) are the same as mine, which should mean they are the standard RVF400 units!
The same goes to the Pilot Jets, standard 35's!
Looks like only the main jets were changed, possibly to suit an aftermarket zorst & maybe different air filter too!

P.s. My carbs are still not fitted, so if you need confirmation of what's on my carbs I can open them up and take a photo or two!

NOTE: Just checked the parts manual and it shows 2 different part numbers for the emulsion tubes - 16165-MR8-900 for cylinders 2&4 (front ones) and 16166-MR8-900 for cylinders 1&3 (rear ones)!
This must mean that they're actually different in some way!? Will have to get mine off again to confirm it!!!...
Yet cool thanks mate
The thing is all 4 r the same on this carb lol
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: Wrong emulsion tubes on my nc35 carbs?

Post by Neosophist »

Usually you have a couple of extra holes in the rear ones (this is going from 24 knowledge) this just richens up the back at idle as they have less air-cooling effect on them
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...

Post Reply