I thought this was cheap

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Post Reply
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
I thought this was cheap

Post by Neosophist »

Missed it as i was in a meeting.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... K:MEWAX:IT

NC30, repsol scheme, low'ish mileage.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
User avatar
CRM
Admin NWAA
Admin NWAA
Posts: 2972
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: NorthWest
Contact:
Re: I thought this was cheap

Post by CRM »

that would be our hipringle.
Insert Signature Here
Spike16
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 1670
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:56 pm
Bike owned: NC30 Road, SV650 Race
Location: Hampshire, Wichester
Re: I thought this was cheap

Post by Spike16 »

shame someone drilled the front fairing cbr style
Akey
Settled in member
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:52 pm
Re: I thought this was cheap

Post by Akey »

Tis mine! But it didn't actually go for that much. I payed £700 oustide of the ebayness but the seller didn't stop the auction. Bike is in in great nick, gutted I didn't bid on it, could have got it even cheaper! But v. pleased with it. It's in perfect working order, starts first time etc. etc. but i'm taking it on to try to restore it to true former glory, mostlly tarting up but I like it :-P
P.S- On a personal note, what do you think of the paint job? I'm going to respray it but not sure if I want to keep it the same or not? Thoughts?
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: I thought this was cheap

Post by Neosophist »

Awesome!

Still cheap as.

Personally I don't like the scheme.. I was gonna bid £650 and get some original panels for it.

Image

And do it like so.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
Akey
Settled in member
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:52 pm
Re: I thought this was cheap

Post by Akey »

Lol, I've seen that one. Am very tempted to go for that look....
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: I thought this was cheap

Post by Neosophist »

Well either that Type 2 scheme above or the classic Type 1 (RWB) as per...


Image
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
User avatar
Drunkn Munky
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 6313
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:37 am
Bike owned: NC30 MC21 TZR FZR GSXR RG MITO
Location: Kent
Re: I thought this was cheap

Post by Drunkn Munky »

Neosophist wrote:Well either that Type 2 scheme above or the classic Type 1 (RWB) as per...


Image
That colour scheme is really nice, id like to see that on a RVF

Post Reply