brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
pugparcels
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:17 pm
Bike owned: nc30 & 929 fireblade
Location: worcester - where the sauce comes from
brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by pugparcels »

i think / hope i know the answer to this ( based on the fact it cant be seen from the outside of a car ) but i am relocating my rear brake reservoir today and had a thought of moving into the tail fairing along with the other part of the rear shock. I have enough space to do this and i know the hose will be longer and therefor use more fluid but it is a legal requirement that a motorcycle brake reservoir is on the outside of a bike?

as we know it is not this way on a car - so could a bike be the same?
User avatar
mrdidlydingo
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 10:41 pm
Bike owned: NC29, 30, 35, RDLC, GSXR
Re: brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by mrdidlydingo »

It is a requirement for the brake to be in working order the location of the components is not relevant !

Its up to you if you wish to carry half a gallon of brake fluid round :lol:

Would suggest rather than repositioning just use a piece of tube with a bung as per HRC type kits as this will have the same effect i.e. hiding it away without the need to make up brackets and mess about relocating the res and therefore clean up the appearance of the bike which I presume is what you are trying to acheive.
User avatar
mattUKNC
NWAA Supporter
NWAA Supporter
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:02 am
Bike owned: Fury, NC30, CRF250L and a C90!
Location: Surrey
Re: brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by mattUKNC »

This was mentioned the other day as another member received an advisory by using the HRC type fitment.

I think it was jowyvfr on here, so maybe he might have a better reply?! :?
Image
pugparcels
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:17 pm
Bike owned: nc30 & 929 fireblade
Location: worcester - where the sauce comes from
Re: brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by pugparcels »

thats a good enough answer for me! i have a bout 2 metres of hose lying around so moving it is not an issue, to keep costs down i can use all existing parts. was more interested in whether with an mot they check it over / check fluild levels. have had many mot's but have never noticed if they had checked!
User avatar
Drunkn Munky
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 6313
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:37 am
Bike owned: NC30 MC21 TZR FZR GSXR RG MITO
Location: Kent
Re: brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by Drunkn Munky »

Make sure the hose you use is res hose, other hose like fuel line etc will weep
pugparcels
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:17 pm
Bike owned: nc30 & 929 fireblade
Location: worcester - where the sauce comes from
Re: brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by pugparcels »

yep is all res hose. think i will hide it inside the tail section along with the res of the shock as well. will post some pics once done.
User avatar
jowyvfr
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:19 pm
Bike owned: Aprilia rs125, nc30,..Van Van!
Location: SW London
Re: brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by jowyvfr »

Not sure about not being able to see it from the outside but i got my advisory as apparently the HRC hose was not classed as me having a rear brake reservoir. It was only an advisory, as apparently you don't need one to pass an MOT...but if you have one that doesn't work...thats a fail!! work that out if you can.
User avatar
mrdidlydingo
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 10:41 pm
Bike owned: NC29, 30, 35, RDLC, GSXR
Re: brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by mrdidlydingo »

There is no reason to get an advisory for using a HRC type reservoir I accept that if it is not a pukka item then it should fail, if there is a leak it should fail (brakes are a sealed hydraulic system), this is obvious, however providing the res capacity is sufficient to service the cylinder and braking system there are no grounds for this, jowyvfr mark a min / max line on the hose with marker pen and tell them to stick there advisory where the sun doesn't shine.

It is unfortunate that a percentage of people who have the power to exclude your vehicle from the road have no concept of the theory of how bikes/cars things work nor why they check the things specified.

Rant done !
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by Neosophist »

I can see the Tester POV on this one.. it's not a resevoir is it, its just a pipe :)

I'm guessing a resevoir is classed somewhere as a container *shrug*

The HRC kits do state not for road use on them. I've not heard of anyone having problems with them though.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
User avatar
mrdidlydingo
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 10:41 pm
Bike owned: NC29, 30, 35, RDLC, GSXR
Re: brake reservoir - mot requirement?

Post by mrdidlydingo »

res⋅er⋅voir  [rez-er-vwahr, -vwawr, -vawr, rez-uh-]

–noun
1. a natural or artificial place where water is collected and stored for use, esp. water for supplying a community, irrigating land, furnishing power, etc.
2. a receptacle or chamber for holding a liquid or fluid.
3. Geology. See under pool 1 (def. 6).
4. Biology. a cavity or part that holds some fluid or secretion.
5. a place where anything is collected or accumulated in great amount.
6. a large or extra supply or stock; reserve: a reservoir of knowledge.

Post Reply