CBR400 History

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Post Reply
User avatar
Davez29
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:38 pm
Bike owned: NC29 forever

CBR400 History

Post by Davez29 » Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:58 pm

ok, just a shot in the dark but does anyone know the full design history of the CBR400?

I know the basics, like it was made just for the Jap market, possibly Tado Baba (Fireblade designer) had a hand in the 400 and many of the things from the 400 were a good test bed for the later 900. But can anyone shed any light into any of this.

sorry but the nerd in me needs this info.

cbr_veze
Settled in member
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:30 pm

Re: CBR400 History

Post by cbr_veze » Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:55 pm

id be realy inerested to find out to, i was talking to my local back street bike engineer. he was saying how all the honda 400s got alot more top spec stuff before the 600s of the era did. as motorcycles i think they are massivley under rated.

User avatar
Cammo
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 4505
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:35 am
Bike owned: NC30
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: CBR400 History

Post by Cammo » Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:13 am

The haynes manuals usually have a small amount of history on the bikes.
"It's just a ride" Bill Hicks

tanuki
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 1571
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:47 pm
Bike owned: CCM404 SM, CBR4/6 in progress
Location: Nottingham U.K

Re: CBR400 History

Post by tanuki » Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:15 am

The 29 is the final bike in an evolution of 3 other bikes the NC17,23 aero, 23 hurricane it was released in 89 and the is no evidence that Baba San had any input into the development of the bike, it was never known as the fireblade or babyblade and any stickers seen on the 400 have been placed there by owners wanting to relate their bike to the successfull 900 (they share very few common parts and are very different bikes).
It was the budget Honda in the range of race rep 400s playing second fiddle the the 30 and later on the 35.

It was raced in the all japan F3 championship as there are kit parts out there but again played second fiddle to the NC30 and the NSRs of the time.

User avatar
Davez29
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:38 pm
Bike owned: NC29 forever

Re: CBR400 History

Post by Davez29 » Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:01 am

tanuki wrote:The 29 is the final bike in an evolution of 3 other bikes the NC17,23 aero, 23 hurricane it was released in 89 and the is no evidence that Baba San had any input into the development of the bike, it was never known as the fireblade or babyblade and any stickers seen on the 400 have been placed there by owners wanting to relate their bike to the successfull 900 (they share very few common parts and are very different bikes).
It was the budget Honda in the range of race rep 400s playing second fiddle the the 30 and later on the 35.

It was raced in the all japan F3 championship as there are kit parts out there but again played second fiddle to the NC30 and the NSRs of the time.
Yes, I generally agree with some of your comments and Im certain there are no common parts but is it not that the technology itself was a good proving ground for the later 900? I don't know what input Tado Baba has had on the nc29 or if he did how much he translated to the 900 but it would be nice to know. I suppose most design and dev will be archived at Honda HQ somewhere. Thats the sort of info I would love to browse.

Also that "Fireblade" sticker was added to the final Type 7 & 8 models by Honda. I suppose it was just a marketing ploy by Honda for the Japanese youth. Babyblade is just a general term used in the UK market from what I have gathered.

Here is a picture from the official brochure : http://www.vsource.org/VFR-RVF_files/Br ... 994-2a.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I know the CBR did race at IOM and was successful but was ultimately beaten by the V4s but hey both bikes are good I reckon.

http://www.iomtt.com/TT-Database/Events ... race_seq=4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Finally just a thought that crossed my mind, as its a bike made just for the Japanese home market, why did it have English graphics on the bike? Im thinking of Castrec Gullarm & Direct Air Intake. Surely a home market bike should be in its own language/text. makes no difference but slightly odd, unless everyone in Japan now speaks English.

leopard_pagan
Senior Member
Posts: 1184
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 6:42 am
Bike owned: CBR400/600 Fighter
Location: Mildenhall-Suffolk
Contact:

Re: CBR400 History

Post by leopard_pagan » Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:10 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_CBR400RR" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

if you have a wiki account you can amend the history

greggo
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:08 pm

Re: CBR400 History

Post by greggo » Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:06 pm

The japanese model bikes had english on them because it was perceived in Japan that it was 'high tech' and had a little more marketing or street cred if it had english words.

If you look at some Japanese after market parts, particularly in the car market, you will often see non-sensical english verbs on them. I guess it was all perception and marketing, in the same way you would look at an acronym now, is the way the japanese would have looked at English then.

Post Reply