NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Bike_Nut
Settled in member
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:48 pm
NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by Bike_Nut »

I have bought an nc35 engine with a small piece broken out of the clutch side of the crank cases. My original intention was to use good bits like cams, heads and pistons in my nc30 track bike but its low miles and I am considering welding it to use complete. Has anyone compiled a list of differences in the engines? If not I can think of the following nc35 improvements:

Cams - lighter, small amount more exhaust duration
Heads - smaller intake ports, reputedly lighter but that could be the cam weight.
Pistons - lower friction, reputedly higher cr.
Gears - lower 1st, not necessarily better.
Clutch - less plates but thicker. Unknown benefits.
Flywheel - lighter?
Crank/bearings? Lower friction?
User avatar
bikemonkey
NWAA Supporter
NWAA Supporter
Posts: 1524
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:33 pm
Bike owned: 92 NC30, 90 VFR750
Location: Oxfordshire
Re: NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by bikemonkey »

Ignition pick-ups are different too, NC30 has two and NC35 has one.
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by Neosophist »

Bike_Nut wrote:I have bought an nc35 engine with a small piece broken out of the clutch side of the crank cases. My original intention was to use good bits like cams, heads and pistons in my nc30 track bike but its low miles and I am considering welding it to use complete. Has anyone compiled a list of differences in the engines? If not I can think of the following nc35 improvements:

Cams - lighter, small amount more exhaust duration
Heads - smaller intake ports, reputedly lighter but that could be the cam weight.
Pistons - lower friction, reputedly higher cr.
Gears - lower 1st, not necessarily better.
Clutch - less plates but thicker. Unknown benefits.
Flywheel - lighter?
Crank/bearings? Lower friction?
Most of the main engine differences are outlined by Honda in the sales documentation avaiable at that time, im sure theres a copy floating around on the site somewhere, it has a comparission of the cams as well as information on the valves being 1mm smaller.

The facelift / redesign was to improve road use drivability, in a sense moving away from the racebred pedigree of the earlier bikes.

It was also at this time the Japanese law changed so the bike could only make 53hp (hence them being lower power from the factory).
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
Bike_Nut
Settled in member
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:48 pm
Re: NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by Bike_Nut »

As far as I can tell the valves are the same size, just the ports smaller.

I am more interested in the unpublished data. For example both bikes have 11.3 compression ratio but common rumour has it that nc35 pistons give slighly higher ratio in a 30. Is this true or another misconception like nc23 wheel weight?
User avatar
Cammo
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 4505
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:35 am
Bike owned: NC30
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by Cammo »

Not true, both pistons give the same compression ratio.

I believe nc35 pistons raise the compression in nc29 engines though.
"It's just a ride" Bill Hicks
james66
NOT TO BE TRUSTED
NOT TO BE TRUSTED
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:49 pm
Location: Littlehampton - West Sussex
Re: NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by james66 »

Yes the rvf pistons in nc29's do make a good compression increase
2013 Bemsee EDIasia F400 Sub64 Champion :)

NC30 + NC35 RS250 HRC aluminium rear axle group buy
viewtopic.php?f=78&t=45065&start=10
bean
Settled in member
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:08 pm
Re: NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by bean »

eBay engine from Northampton by any chance?
User avatar
skinnydog0_0
NWAA Supporter
NWAA Supporter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:07 pm
Bike owned: Penny Farthing
Location: Pembrokeshire West Wales
Re: NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by skinnydog0_0 »

From all the info i have read, the valves are the same, and as has been said - the nc29's benefit from rvf pistons.
The 30 and the 35 have little/no difference between the pistons. the RVf ones are very very slightly lighter.
The 35 has narrower inlet ports/ways to increase the velocity of the air/fuel and the cams have a different profile on the 35 (better) cant give exact figures so wont say what.
As said already, you have differebnt pickups and pusle generator that must be used with the matching CDI i.e. 35 puls, genny pickups and cdi must be used together.
An NC is for life, not just for Christmas!
Bike_Nut
Settled in member
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:48 pm
Re: NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by Bike_Nut »

http://hondanc30.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03 ... pdate.html

The nc35 is a more modern design but good to know the cr is the same.

And yes, its the Northampton engine :-)
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: NC30 vs NC35 engine differences

Post by Neosophist »

http://www.honda.co.jp/factbook/motor/RVF/19940100/

RVF400 press info, shouldnt reply when im half asleep.

Intake ports are 1mm diameter smaller to match along with the camshaft and carb changes.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...

Post Reply