Dyno results advice

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
jimlad
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:23 pm
Bike owned: nc30 1992
Location: Doncaster
Dyno results advice

Post by jimlad »

Hi, what would i need to be looking at to improve this?

Image


Any advice welcome.

Thanks.
Last edited by jimlad on Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nickbawt
Settled in member
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 8:49 am
Bike owned: VFR400 NC30, RGV250 VJ21
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: Dyno results advice

Post by nickbawt »

Can you upload a bigger pic?

Whats your current setup?

Need some more info..
jimlad
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:23 pm
Bike owned: nc30 1992
Location: Doncaster
Re: Dyno results advice

Post by jimlad »

Hi , the bike is running yamamoto half system, blueflame can, airbox is standard, 120 jets front 122 rear.

Thanks.
johnnie5
Settled in member
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:59 pm
Re: Dyno results advice

Post by johnnie5 »

looks fairly decent , what are you unhappy with and what are you trying to achieve ?
MikeyIsAwesome
Settled in member
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:26 pm
Location: kings Lynn - Norfolk
Re: Dyno results advice

Post by MikeyIsAwesome »

That air fuel ratio is horrible. That should be flat as it can be on the red line. Power curve looks good though

Not sure why it's done in speed normally done in rpm
jimlad
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:23 pm
Bike owned: nc30 1992
Location: Doncaster
Re: Dyno results advice

Post by jimlad »

Yes would like to get the air/fuel graph abit tighter to the red line, what could be the cause of the fluctuation?
Morespeedvicar
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 1:37 am
Bike owned: Fzr400, NC30, CB50J, SS50Z KLR
Location: Grimsby
Re: Dyno results advice

Post by Morespeedvicar »

If i rides nicely, and feels good, i'd leave it alone, Does it feel rich ? if so maybe drop the mains down a size.
User avatar
alexwitham
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 1340
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 10:04 pm
Bike owned: 675R, GSXR6, NC30
Location: Norwich
Re: Dyno results advice

Post by alexwitham »

If it feels 'wrong' then I'd be dropping the jets to 118/120.
MikeyIsAwesome
Settled in member
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:26 pm
Location: kings Lynn - Norfolk
Re: Dyno results advice

Post by MikeyIsAwesome »

Could be the slides moving to fast. Have they had an extra hole drilled into the bottom of them. That can cause them to move to fast and ruin things.

I don't see why it's on speed Along the bottom, that doesn't show anything useful really. It should be in Rpm. And the smoothing factor, they are normally on 3 I think because on 5 like it is kind of covers a few more holes.

If it does need jetting which it looks like it might then there should be some lost power to be brought back.

THeres a good place in west Norfolk for dyno work, called X bikes.

Try them if you are looking at good work.
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: Dyno results advice

Post by Neosophist »

Power wise 58 is very good, bining rear pads and chain can easily take away a couple of horse power.

As others have said, how does it feel? the power curve looks nice and linear, try not to get over obsessed by air/fuel graph, people who tune to this alone often churn out bikes that feel horrible to ride, having said that you can probably get it fuelling a little cleaner but hwo much more it will change the curve i dont know, if the smoothing on the graph was knocked down a little youd see more twitchyness i suppose.

Its all down to time and cost, id consider 118/120 or 115/118 jets though.

As for everything else if its ok dont fix it, the more you try to get power above what you have the more it turns into a race bike, which means it doesnt ride as smoothly on the streets.

What are you hoping to get?
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...

Post Reply