Is it worth upgrading to Later NC30 forks (and rear shock)?

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Post Reply
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Is it worth upgrading to Later NC30 forks (and rear shock)?

Post by Neosophist »

I have a 1989 VFR400RK

I know the early forks are damper-rod and the later ones cartridge type, they also have more adjustments.

My forks are ok and not leaking but I can get a later set in good condition fairly cheap here.

Would they be beneficial?

Also.. is the later type rear-shock with the remote resevoir any better than the shock on the RK model?

And finally need to replace the pads and over-haul the calipers.. are the Nissin pads still the best to get?

Many thanks :-)
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
User avatar
banoffee
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:44 am
Location: Surrey
Contact:
Re: Is it worth upgrading to Later NC30 forks (and rear shoc

Post by banoffee »

Am running an 89 NC30 and stuck with the forks and shock. At the front have got a Rick Oliver upgrade kit and at the rear a jackup linkage. Been through and replaced the wheel+hub bearings and cleaned/greased all the linkages. Massive improvement over stock/tired.
attention 2 detail - bike valeting and more
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: Is it worth upgrading to Later NC30 forks (and rear shoc

Post by Neosophist »

banoffee wrote:Am running an 89 NC30 and stuck with the forks and shock. At the front have got a Rick Oliver upgrade kit and at the rear a jackup linkage. Been through and replaced the wheel+hub bearings and cleaned/greased all the linkages. Massive improvement over stock/tired.
Wicked cheers for the reply.. this isn't tired at all but I have easy access to the later forks ;)
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
VFR400-NC30-SWEENEY
Settled in member
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:35 pm
Bike owned: VFR400 nc30
Location: Crawley
Re: Is it worth upgrading to Later NC30 forks (and rear shoc

Post by VFR400-NC30-SWEENEY »

What odes the jack up linkage do. Does it increase ride height?
User avatar
Hadies
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 606
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:20 am
Bike owned: NSR125, NC30, Daytona 675
Location: Washington, Tyne and Wear
Re: Is it worth upgrading to Later NC30 forks (and rear shoc

Post by Hadies »

Yep. Shorter linkage = Raised ride height
User avatar
porndoguk
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 3293
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:17 pm
Bike owned: NC30
Location: Middle England
Contact:
Re: Is it worth upgrading to Later NC30 forks (and rear shoc

Post by porndoguk »

+1 for a more modern shock, i found the back to be much firmer and absorb better than the original rumour has it the old ones suffer from heat absorbtion, which makes them soft and floppy!

where as the newer/ Lmodel onwards with the remote resovoir are much better, can pick them up for pennies so give it a try.

rick
NC30 & NC23 33BHP Restrictors For Sale
£25 Inc P&P and donation to 400GB PM for more details


http://www.bikerstraining.com

Like us on Facebook for more information - First Bike on Scene - Emergency Response Skills - UK

Post Reply