nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Post by Neosophist »

Ask the guy on here who has one how his runs..

Well, off the top of my head...

NC30 frame is better.. brakes / suspension are also better!

NC24 has an oil cooler as standard. Servicing costs are cheaper. (chepaer plugs)

Stock motors produce identical power and torque yet the NC24 fires 180.. :) I prefer that sound :P
Valve clearances dont' require shims to readjust

Depends on what your used to tuning I guess :)

Plus its not too commonplace..

And in the 30 frame you can use 30 exhaust systems :D Dual stack lefty... oh yes!
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
fastdruid
Regular Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:39 pm
Re: nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Post by fastdruid »

Neosophist wrote:Valve clearances dont' require shims to readjust
That makes life *so* much easier, sure you need to do them more but they are so much easier to do, genuine F1 technology on the RC24 too (I presume the same for the NC24).
Neosophist wrote:And in the 30 frame you can use 30 exhaust systems :D Dual stack lefty... oh yes!
Well you *could* except that's surely all wrong for the firing order?

NC30/35 pair the front and rear banks together and then join them. ie 1&3 are paired then 2&4

The RC24 (ie 180 firing order) pairs both left and both right together and then joins them (in a 4-2-1-2 originally). ie 1&2 and 3&4.

I believe (but can't remember) the NC24 does a straight 4-1.

How much difference it would make in the real world I don't know.

Druid
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Post by Neosophist »

fastdruid wrote:
Neosophist wrote:Valve clearances dont' require shims to readjust
That makes life *so* much easier, sure you need to do them more but they are so much easier to do, genuine F1 technology on the RC24 too (I presume the same for the NC24).
Neosophist wrote:And in the 30 frame you can use 30 exhaust systems :D Dual stack lefty... oh yes!
Well you *could* except that's surely all wrong for the firing order?

NC30/35 pair the front and rear banks together and then join them. ie 1&3 are paired then 2&4

The RC24 (ie 180 firing order) pairs both left and both right together and then joins them (in a 4-2-1-2 originally). ie 1&2 and 3&4.

I believe (but can't remember) the NC24 does a straight 4-1.

How much difference it would make in the real world I don't know.

Druid
Yeah it's 4-1 standard. And oh shit yes :P

Y'know I hadn't actually put much thought into that yet, my main concerns been with getting the rear pipes out of the way of the centrally mounted shock, similar to how the NC30 does... hence borrowing the design. >.<

Image

The NC24's TT-F3 version is right / left bank paired too, also in a 4-1 config.

And yes.. valve clearnaces that can be checked and adjusted with a spanner is much easier ^_^ I think the shims are supposed to increase the interval between check points.. but the increase is offset by the cost :/
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
User avatar
spooky
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:37 pm
Bike owned: nc24
Location: Newtownards Co.Down N.Ireland
Re: nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Post by spooky »

Hey Neo. that gives me an idea. :idea: Do you think it would be possible to run an NC24 with twin exhausts like that but one on each side so it avoids the shock problem? That way it could have smaller silencer boxes. 8-)
\That wee smilie can drink some Guinness. No wonder he's yellow.
fastdruid
Regular Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:39 pm
Re: nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Post by fastdruid »

Neosophist wrote: Image

The NC24's TT-F3 version is right / left bank paired too, also in a 4-1 config.
*cough* 4-2-1.

Druid
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Post by Neosophist »

fastdruid wrote:
Neosophist wrote: Image

The NC24's TT-F3 version is right / left bank paired too, also in a 4-1 config.
*cough* 4-2-1.

Druid
Haha! That was a geunine typo :P I meant also in a 4-2-1, like in the RC24 you mentioned :-)
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
fastdruid
Regular Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:39 pm
Re: nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Post by fastdruid »

spooky wrote:Hey Neo. that gives me an idea. :idea: Do you think it would be possible to run an NC24 with twin exhausts like that but one on each side so it avoids the shock problem? That way it could have smaller silencer boxes. 8-)
No reason you couldn't, it's pretty much how the RC24 does it.
First like this:
Image

Then later bikes like this:
Image

That joins the two before it splits again but you could just leave out part '4' and run two pipes.

Druid
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954
Re: nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Post by Neosophist »

fastdruid wrote:
spooky wrote:Hey Neo. that gives me an idea. :idea: Do you think it would be possible to run an NC24 with twin exhausts like that but one on each side so it avoids the shock problem? That way it could have smaller silencer boxes. 8-)
No reason you couldn't, it's pretty much how the RC24 does it.
First like this:
Image

Then later bikes like this:
Image

That joins the two before it splits again but you could just leave out part '4' and run two pipes.

Druid
Thats easier to implement on the NC24 than having it split front / rear... :grin:
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...
User avatar
spooky
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:37 pm
Bike owned: nc24
Location: Newtownards Co.Down N.Ireland
Re: nc24 very low compression, fkd ?

Post by spooky »

MMMMuuuhhh. lovley thats what is required then...........
Thanks for the insperation Hic...
\That wee smilie can drink some Guinness. No wonder he's yellow.

Post Reply