My NC30 Dyno Results.

Post by **Cammo** » Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:58 pm

G-MAN wrote:Just another silly question but wen Honda measured it back in the day what RON Fuel did they use and was it really that efficient in today's standards?

91RON unleaded.

Post by **G-MAN** » Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:49 pm

So then we can't really go on Honda's numbers either Stickshift or what do you think?
?

Post by **Cammo** » Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:22 am

G-MAN wrote:So then we can't really go on Honda's numbers either Stickshift or what do you think?

Honda's figure is as accurate as they want to report it.

Putting anything higher in than 91ron won't increase performance unless you've raised the compression or advanced the ignition to the point that it's detonating on 91ron.

sorbe88 · Post by **sorbe88** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:54 pm

Just a quick note from an engineer...

BHP is BRAKE horse power, the brake part refers to being at the crank;

HP is just horse power, ie referring to that produced at the rear wheel.

So, rear wheel power is stated in HP, while engine power is stated in BHP.

Hope that helps!

alexwitham · Post by **alexwitham** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:05 pm

Putting anything higher in than 91ron won't increase performance

I use shell VPOWER 1 in 3 tank fulls, ive no idea why, but ive done it with all my bikes. I think its all personal preference.

My NC30 Dyno Results.

Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.

Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.

Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.

Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.

Re: My NC30 Dyno Results.