Page 9 of 13

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:13 am
by Cammo
Pretty sure the jets Rick sells have RO stamped on them.

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:25 am
by Drunkn Munky
Cammo wrote:Pretty sure the jets Rick sells have RO stamped on them.
So are these the keihin jets he sells then? im confused :? He only lists keihin and DJ, ive never heard of any mention of RO jets

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:05 am
by Cammo
Drunkn Munky wrote:
Cammo wrote:Pretty sure the jets Rick sells have RO stamped on them.
So are these the keihin jets he sells then?
Possibly, I've never received any genuine keihin jets from Rick.

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:35 am
by phil x
Cammo wrote:Pretty sure the jets Rick sells have RO stamped on them.
I have just had a look at the RO supplied mains that I removed the other day. They are stamped AB 117.5/115.

Having had a good run to Stafford on Saturday, taking a mixture of roads, the stuttering is nowhere near as bad as 1st impressions on my previous short blast - infact the bike pulls crisp & strong from 8k with just the odd slight hiccup occasionally at about 11k. Of more concern is the sluggish spot seems more pronounced & over a greater part of the rev range than previously, was in the 5.5-7k range now sluggish from 5 to 7.5k rpm.

I'll try some Keihin jets & go from there :P

Who else saw that beautiful RWB NC30 inside the hall, with only 9k on the clocks.
Was it totally genuine, the female who was keeping an eye on it said she bought it brand new, now sold it to her friend & that it was an '89 UK model but it was a Holmogenated(?) special bike with oil catch tank, later model forks & other cahnges. Does this sound right??
Looked nice tho ;)

Phil

Phil

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:03 am
by hunter
It sounds like some Aliens have landed with something special,that no one else has ever seen before.

( AGAIN)

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:38 am
by Neosophist
phil x wrote:
Cammo wrote:Pretty sure the jets Rick sells have RO stamped on them.
I have just had a look at the RO supplied mains that I removed the other day. They are stamped AB 117.5/115.

Having had a good run to Stafford on Saturday, taking a mixture of roads, the stuttering is nowhere near as bad as 1st impressions on my previous short blast - infact the bike pulls crisp & strong from 8k with just the odd slight hiccup occasionally at about 11k. Of more concern is the sluggish spot seems more pronounced & over a greater part of the rev range than previously, was in the 5.5-7k range now sluggish from 5 to 7.5k rpm.

I'll try some Keihin jets & go from there :P

Who else saw that beautiful RWB NC30 inside the hall, with only 9k on the clocks.
Was it totally genuine, the female who was keeping an eye on it said she bought it brand new, now sold it to her friend & that it was an '89 UK model but it was a Holmogenated(?) special bike with oil catch tank, later model forks & other cahnges. Does this sound right??
Looked nice tho ;)

Phil

Phil
Sounds like an excuse for a bitsa but could be wrong.

That hole in the midrange is needle transition time.

Are your needles shimmed? If so how many shims on them?

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:56 am
by phil x
Yep, deffo start of needle lift area of rev range.

I want to get the top end/mains right so needles are still stock with a single .5mm washer.

just ordered 4 - 115 Keihin mains off ebay.

Phil

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:45 pm
by philfingers
on the subjest of mains when I stripped mine for inspection the number stamped on the mains was barely legible, i'd say 99% they were what they should be and were in the right place. but should they be that hard to read, it's was almost as tho they were erroded away a little.
Phil

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:59 pm
by arsey30
Neosophist wrote:
phil x wrote:[

Who else saw that beautiful RWB NC30 inside the hall, with only 9k on the clocks.
Was it totally genuine, the female who was keeping an eye on it said she bought it brand new, now sold it to her friend & that it was an '89 UK model but it was a Holmogenated(?) special bike with oil catch tank, later model forks & other cahnges. Does this sound right??
Looked nice tho ;)

l

Phil
Sounds like an excuse for a bitsa but could be wrong.
It looked all correct to me, only the 1989 seemed wrong as the frame number was 319, much later than my mid 1990s registered bike.
Did the owner mean it was different to Jap model, not much would have been known 21 years ago and memories can be confused.

The current owner Andy Bolas is well know in the VJMC I think, he will know the answer.

Re: Dyno Disappointment.....

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:02 pm
by jim157
^^^
Didn't the rumours of the possible existence of 'special edition' UK bikes get put to bed in another thread a few months back?