Not to rain on anyone's parade, here, but these photos actually help illustrate why other drivers HATE these HID conversion kits, and one reason why they are illegal in most western countries...
leopard_pagan wrote:

As you can see, the OEM low beam is fairly weak, but all of the light is below the "cut-off", which keeps it out of the eyes of other drivers. In the "after" photo, you can see how much brighter the HID is, but also how much of that light is now above the "cut-off" line. So, not only is it 5x brighter than before, it's now reflecting right in their eyes. Lovely!
But what you can't see from these photos is how much light is most likely now flooding the foreground in front of the bike. You may think that is great, but there is a reason why automotive lighting engineers design headlamps so that the foreground is generally not illuminated very much, and that is because the more you can see, the more your eyes are drawn to things that appear in that area. But, as you know, when riding your bike you are supposed to be looking up, as far ahead as you can see, not down onto the road surface or to the immediate sides of the road. Perhaps you can train yourself not to look in those areas, but maybe you can't (i.e., maybe they know what they're doing after all!)...
The main problem with "upgrading" headlamps is that they are designed for a particluar level of light output and a particular type of light source, and by changing the light source, you are basically just bodging-up a functional (if not ideal) lighting system in ways that could have significant drawbacks not only for the rider, but for other road users as well. HID capsules produce light in a completely different way than H4 halogen bulbs. The brightest part of an H4 is the middle; the brightest parts of an HID arc are at the ends; moreover, the shape of the light source is much different. Reflector headlamps just reflect what they're given, so if you give them a big blob of light where there was once a thin filament, the reflector will simply reflect the extra light in other, unintended directions. That is called "glare".
To a certain extent, adding additional light in the form of a high-powered H4 could also cause problems, because not only are you doubling the light where you want it (distance), but you necessarily also double the light where you don't (foreground), but given that the rest of the design specification is the same, at least you don't have the additional reflection of glare all over the place. Also, given that Honda did produce NC30 headlamps designed for "regular" H4s (UK-spec), it is possible that the J-spec headlamp units are already designed for the higher-output H4s (even if the bulb holders are different).
As far as NCs go, you're probably okay with doing a regular H4 upgrade (for the above reasons), but to really realise an improvement you need to change the whole lighting system, not just one part of it. That's where Xenon retrofits come in. A retrofit involves taking the headlamp unit from another vehicle and retroftting it to another vehicle (i.e., your bike). You don't need the housing if the headlamp system uses a projector, which is convenient, because you're unlikely to be able to accomodate any complete car headlamp systems on any bike, much less a tiny NC29/30. Fortunately, some OEM projectors are quite small (I've retrofitted Infiniti G35 projectors into VFR800Fi and ST1300 headlamp housings), but they may not be small enough to squeeze into the limited space behind the fairing on an NC. There are smaller OEM projectors, but I have not had a chance to play with any.
Yes, I have HID conversion kits installed on two of my bikes, so I am familiar with the attraction, and I was initially quite happy with the results. But I've subsequently learned a lot more about the subject, to the extent that I will be removing my kits at the earliest opportunity. Anyone want some cheap, somewhat used, imported HID junk?
Ciao,
JZH
London, UK
http://www.vsource.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;