What't wrong with this bike ?

[STYLER]

HA! thats the bike showroom i was ravin on about before with the RC30's etc. Those Dymags are nice but nothing unusual. Good job they didnt have or i didnt see that NC.... id have burst out laughing!!

[ibby4585]

Oh and the reg light pod thing is on upside down isn't it, shouldnt it be above the numberplate?

Kris

[Drunkn Munky]

lol oh yeah, so it is.
so thats my mistake then.
i thought how the hell can a UK spec bike on a 1990 be wearing a F reg plate.
It was infact me who failed to notice it was in fact a RC30 in the last picture.

wood for the trees's and all that.

you plonker, i see that i thought well it aint gunna be that bloody obvious.

You've given me a complex, i was going over them pics with a fine toothcomb mumbling i must find the defect!!

[arsey30]

To be fair, they do look alike and I would not expect someone to be able to tell them apart unless they owned one or both and knew that they had VFR 400 or 750 written on the side. :-)

Dave.

[Neosophist]

It has what looks like 2 out of 3 Dzus fastners too.

Why not do all 3?

[Cammo]

It has what looks like 2 out of 3 Dzus fastners too.

Why not do all 3?

That's standard Neo.

[phil x]

Later type forks, no exhaust heat shield on RH side???

Phil

[banoffee]

Not a clue, im too interested in that RC with the dymags

[Martin]

d'you know whats really sad? The only thing that gave it away for me was that the mirrors had changed colour in the last pic.

[hunter]

In the 5th pic the last 3 digits on the number plate are ocy,and the reflector is on the number plate.
In the last pic the number is F735 EKE and the reflector is where it should be.