Page 2 of 2

Re: Standard CDI vs Ignitech Programmable CDI - Dyno Results

Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:46 pm
by banoffee
Nice one. How do they compare to the 'original' HRC map? Am running that with shell v-power or similar and it seems to go like a rocket. Not sure if the fuel makes a big difference but the combination 'seems' to work well. Mine is stock other than the CDI, race can and jetting.

Re: Standard CDI vs Ignitech Programmable CDI - Dyno Results

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:24 am
by alexwitham
I prefer the HRC-2 and the improved standard maps over the original HRC (improved standard is what im using). However i would have thought if you had a bike like Dm's RLR stage 3 RVF, the Original HRC would be the better out of the 3. It really depends on the state of engine tune.
I use v-power fuel in my NC's as it seems to burn better/cleaner, whether thats a fact or not but lets not go there ;)
Maybe contact Rick and get the settings/file for the improved standard or HRC-2 and see what you think?

Alex

Re: Standard CDI vs Ignitech Programmable CDI - Dyno Results

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:17 pm
by banoffee
Cheers. Already got both, will give them a go.

Re: Standard CDI vs Ignitech Programmable CDI - Dyno Results

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:05 pm
by banoffee
Been running the HRC-2 map for a while now. Had adjusted the redline to 14,500 and also tweaked the tacho output so that it's more accurate. One of my fave upgrades on the bike :grin:

Re: Standard CDI vs Ignitech Programmable CDI - Dyno Results

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:11 pm
by alexwitham
Great mod imo.