Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
-
- Settled in member
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:13 pm
Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
I am aware that the NC35 cams are a longer duration than the NC30 ones and the valves and carbs are slightly smaller. I assume Honda designed it this way so that all the components compliment each other in order to give a good overall package of power and flexibility.
What is the effect of installing NC35 cams onto the NC30 whilst retaining the NC30 bigger carbs and valves?
Although, in theory, the cams could offer more air volume I am also aware that drop in air velocity could have negative effects on swirl and the propogation of the flame front.
In order to take full advantage of longer duration cams, would it be necessary to use a full HRC induction setup as well as a full race exhaust?
What is the effect of installing NC35 cams onto the NC30 whilst retaining the NC30 bigger carbs and valves?
Although, in theory, the cams could offer more air volume I am also aware that drop in air velocity could have negative effects on swirl and the propogation of the flame front.
In order to take full advantage of longer duration cams, would it be necessary to use a full HRC induction setup as well as a full race exhaust?
- lukemillar
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:43 pm
- Bike owned: '89 NC30 Racebike #24
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
The differences are really minimal. There is a graph floating about on here (I printed it out a while ago) and I think the only different is the exhaust duration. Intakes have the same lift/dur as the NC30.scooble wrote:I am aware that the NC35 cams are a longer duration than the NC30 ones and the valves and carbs are slightly smaller. I assume Honda designed it this way so that all the components compliment each other in order to give a good overall package of power and flexibility.
What is the effect of installing NC35 cams onto the NC30 whilst retaining the NC30 bigger carbs and valves?
Although, in theory, the cams could offer more air volume I am also aware that drop in air velocity could have negative effects on swirl and the propogation of the flame front.
In order to take full advantage of longer duration cams, would it be necessary to use a full HRC induction setup as well as a full race exhaust?
I think the biggest thing you could change with stock cams is to slot them and to allow you to alter the timing.
- Cammo
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 4505
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:35 am
- Bike owned: NC30
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
Valve size is the same between the engines as far as I remember.
This diagram shows the difference between vfr and rvf cams - both intake and exhaust cams are different.

Some reputable tuners on this site think that you can extract more power from the rvf engine because of bearing differences etc and other evolutions that improved rvf engine efficiency. Plenty of track bikes (including my old one) use vfr carbs on rvf engines.
This diagram shows the difference between vfr and rvf cams - both intake and exhaust cams are different.

Some reputable tuners on this site think that you can extract more power from the rvf engine because of bearing differences etc and other evolutions that improved rvf engine efficiency. Plenty of track bikes (including my old one) use vfr carbs on rvf engines.
"It's just a ride" Bill Hicks
- lukemillar
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:43 pm
- Bike owned: '89 NC30 Racebike #24
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
I thought the valves on the NC35 were smaller?Cammo wrote:Valve size is the same between the engines as far as I remember.
- Cammo
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 4505
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:35 am
- Bike owned: NC30
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
I honestly can't remember, and don't have the haynes manual in front of me!
"It's just a ride" Bill Hicks
- lukemillar
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:43 pm
- Bike owned: '89 NC30 Racebike #24
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
Found this on v4power.co.uk:Cammo wrote:I honestly can't remember, and don't have the haynes manual in front of me!
Nothing on the valve size though, so I'm probably be wrong!Cams:
A good deal of the weight saved in the engine comes from the use of hollow camshafts. This also helps to reduce inertia. The NC35 exhaust cam is a slightly steeper profile; 1mm lift is achieved at 142-degrees, as opposed to 145-degrees on the NC30 cam (measured from 0-degrees cam angle). This will help speed up venting of the cylinder, effectively giving more opportunity for the rising piston to push out the exhaust gases. Total lift and duration are identical between engines.
The NC35’s inlet cam has a slightly longer duration; the extra 3-degrees are gained before effective opening, suggesting the cam initially opens the valve less aggressively, whilst still achieving the same total lift of 7.7mm.
-
- Settled in member
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:48 pm
Re: Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
The thing you have to remember is that the RVF mods were not in search of more power. The Japanese manufacturers had a gentlemans agreement to limit the power of the 400 class and the NC30 was already arguably above the limit. The RVF mods were aimed at boosting the midrange while keeping a similar top end, hence smaller porting/carbs
As such using the NC35 cams should help an NC30 to a tiny bit more power. I think any effect would be very small, but the lighter weight is nice as well as the gentler opening ramp on the inlet might have been to help with wear rates.
As such using the NC35 cams should help an NC30 to a tiny bit more power. I think any effect would be very small, but the lighter weight is nice as well as the gentler opening ramp on the inlet might have been to help with wear rates.
-
- Settled in member
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:13 pm
Re: Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
V4 power.co.uk say that the inlet valve on the NC30 is 1mm dia bigger than the NC35, but the exhaust valves are the same. So it looks as far as I can see that for top end power at least, NC35 cams, pistons in an NC30 would be beneficial.
- lukemillar
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:43 pm
- Bike owned: '89 NC30 Racebike #24
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
Cams are an easy enough swap, but I would't go to the expense of changing to 35 pistons (full strip down) without doing other engine work while you're in there as I don't think the pistons alone hold enough benefit to warrant the work.scooble wrote:V4 power.co.uk say that the inlet valve on the NC30 is 1mm dia bigger than the NC35, but the exhaust valves are the same. So it looks as far as I can see that for top end power at least, NC35 cams, pistons in an NC30 would be beneficial.
- skinnydog0_0
- NWAA Supporter
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:07 pm
- Bike owned: Penny Farthing
- Location: Pembrokeshire West Wales
Re: Cams, Valves and Carb matching question
The inlet valves have the same part number so i would think they are the same size??
An NC is for life, not just for Christmas!