nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by Neosophist » Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:37 am

thunderace wrote:If the charging system is working correctly then this mod shouldn't be necessary.

Difficulty starting in the colder weather? Is the choke operating correctly? What's the air/fuel ratio like? As standard, the NC24 runs too lean for the UK.
How did you come to that concluison?

115 is stock NC24 jetting albeit the earliest NC24s had 112/115.

Thats fine for the stock system.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...

User avatar
thunderace
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:03 pm
Bike owned: R6, YZF600R
Location: Blackburn, Lancs.

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by thunderace » Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:49 am

Neosophist wrote:
thunderace wrote:If the charging system is working correctly then this mod shouldn't be necessary.

Difficulty starting in the colder weather? Is the choke operating correctly? What's the air/fuel ratio like? As standard, the NC24 runs too lean for the UK.
How did you come to that concluison?

115 is stock NC24 jetting albeit the earliest NC24s had 112/115.

Thats fine for the stock system.

You show me an NC24 that is true factory original in every aspect.

Even so, they do run lean in standard setup.
Conventional wisdom says to know your limits. To know your limits you need to find them first. Finding your limits generally involves getting in over your head and hoping you live long enough to benefit from the experience. That's the fun part.

Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by Neosophist » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:54 pm

thunderace wrote:
Neosophist wrote:
thunderace wrote:If the charging system is working correctly then this mod shouldn't be necessary.

Difficulty starting in the colder weather? Is the choke operating correctly? What's the air/fuel ratio like? As standard, the NC24 runs too lean for the UK.
How did you come to that concluison?

115 is stock NC24 jetting albeit the earliest NC24s had 112/115.

Thats fine for the stock system.

You show me an NC24 that is true factory original in every aspect.

Even so, they do run lean in standard setup.
every aspect?

I can't really see how some modified paint and wheels will affect jetting.

The only aftermarket systems I know for the NC24 consist of an end-can and link pipe, even the DIC aluminium link-pipe end can is designed to work with the standard jetting. I've ran many end-cans on my 24 with a link-pipe and non of them needed a rejet.

The only reason I can see if if somebody intentionally down-sized the NC24 jets.

I stand by my original statment that the stock jetting on the NC24 is fine for 99% of people.

and fwiw my NC24 is factory spec regarding jetting what not., 14000km original toolkit and handbook still present along with service manual, parts book and other things.

Apart from that I have fitted the NC21 hydraulic clutch and a Yamaha R6 reg/rec relocated to the subframe but none of them will affect jetting.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...

User avatar
speedy231278
NWAA Supporter
NWAA Supporter
Posts: 1549
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:58 am
Bike owned: RVF400, TZR125, ZXR750R

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by speedy231278 » Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:02 pm

More to the point, for starting the bike, would the main jets even affect it anyway? Wouldn't it be running on the idle and maybe pilots at that point?
Image

User avatar
spooky
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:37 pm
Bike owned: nc24
Location: Newtownards Co.Down N.Ireland

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by spooky » Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:50 pm

Ok. Got it all wired up today, getting 14.4 v across battery at idle. 14.3 v with lights on.
Battery was 12.5 v with bike not running, ignition off.
I'll check it again tomorrow and see if its dropping charge.
Strangely when at 5000 rpm it was still at 14.4 v.
Replaced battery leads too. So that should help.
\That wee smilie can drink some Guinness. No wonder he's yellow.

User avatar
bikemonkey
NWAA Supporter
NWAA Supporter
Posts: 1521
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:33 pm
Bike owned: 92 NC30, 90 VFR750
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by bikemonkey » Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:14 pm

Sounds good to me, I did the mod on my NC30.

Got 15v at idle and 14.9v at 5k revs. I figured it was just the reg/rec working harder.

It's been modded for 3 months now I think it is and it's been great.
I usually do very short journeys round town and have never had a problem, never had to charge the battery, but it does help that I have a lithium ion one.

Morespeedvicar
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 1:37 am
Bike owned: Fzr400, NC30, CB50J, SS50Z KLR
Location: Grimsby

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by Morespeedvicar » Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:19 pm

bikemonkey wrote:Sounds good to me, I did the mod on my NC30.

Got 15v at idle and 14.9v at 5k revs. I figured it was just the reg/rec working harder.

It's been modded for 3 months now I think it is and it's been great.
I usually do very short journeys round town and have never had a problem, never had to charge the battery, but it does help that I have a lithium ion one.
Your high voltages are prob more to do with your lipo battery than the reg, they high a higher nominal voltage (usually about14.4v) than the standard lead acid battery 12v.
Cheers
Ian

User avatar
bikemonkey
NWAA Supporter
NWAA Supporter
Posts: 1521
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:33 pm
Bike owned: 92 NC30, 90 VFR750
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by bikemonkey » Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:25 pm

I see, learn something new everyday ;)

What I was really getting at was the 0.1 voltage drop from idle to 5k revs.
Kind of similar to the results spooky is getting, I.e no voltage increase from idle to 5k.

Possibly because the charging system is now as efficient as can be without replacing or upgrading components.

User avatar
spooky
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:37 pm
Bike owned: nc24
Location: Newtownards Co.Down N.Ireland

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by spooky » Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:02 am

so i'm getting good results then, checked the battery and its dropped to 12.3 v overnight, though to be fair i had started it a few times. I will either put it on an optimizer for a while or take it for a run and see how it goes, hopefully alls well now. lol. :whistle:
\That wee smilie can drink some Guinness. No wonder he's yellow.

User avatar
speedy231278
NWAA Supporter
NWAA Supporter
Posts: 1549
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:58 am
Bike owned: RVF400, TZR125, ZXR750R

Re: nc24 reg/rec direct to battery mod.

Post by speedy231278 » Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:48 am

12.3 is very low, although it will start the bike. I thought it was too low to do that, but during my recent woes I've been measuring everything to death and it seems you have to get to almost 12.0 before either the starter runs out of puff or the solenoid won't throw. However, if it was 12.5 previously, and you started the bike lots of times, and didn't measure it again until the next day, that might possibly not have helped. The voltage not changing between idle and 5K may or may not be significant. One thing I would suggest is that you test the voltages, and then take the bike out for 10-15 mins and get it nice and warm. One issue I have right now is that the battery gets low because when the bike gets warm, the charging system stops working until you leave the bike to cool a bit. As yet, I have no answer, but hopefully come next weekend I shall. It might be the reg/rec packing up at temperature, or possibly something weird going on with the battery or wiring.

When you've finished sorting the battery on the optimiser, if you have the opportunity, leave it off the bike for a good few days and keep measuring the voltage present. I'm not sure if batteries settle down after being charged, as in my experience mine comes off the charger at about 13.2 and then once on the bike drops to 12.8 fairly swiftly and stays there, charging issues aside. Supposedly, a healthy and stable battery loses no more than 0.1-0.3% charge in 24 hours, so once yours has settled (if it actually does that in the first place) measure every day at about the same time. If, for argument's sake, your battery starts at 12.80V, then a week later it should have no worse than 12.78 assuming a .3% discharge rate. It's not hard to calculate what you should have, simply open a spreadsheet programme, enter your initial voltage in cell A1 (use two decimal places), and enter cell two as A1-.3% Then drag the formula down into the subsequent cells for as long as the period you're going to measure. If the measured figure is less than the one in the cell for the particular day, you know the battery is not as strong as it could be.
Image

Post Reply