Quick carb question

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Post Reply
User avatar
vfrman
Senior Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:54 pm
Bike owned: NC30, 1098s
Location: Layton, Utah, USA

Quick carb question

Post by vfrman » Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:05 am

Ok....I think I know the answer, but I want to ask anyway.

I was having a problem with the bike revving past 7k, so I got into the carbs thinking it was running too rich. Turns out I had 120s all around. I was also running a stock filter, which was filthy. SO... I rechecked the idle screws and set them to 2 1/4 turns out. (I have a half system on the bike). Also swapped out the fronts for 118s. Finally, I cut out the filter element and replaced it with a k&n panel. I was going to shim the needle and drill out the bleed hole on the slides, but the needles are aftermarket and adjustable, and the hole was already drilled out.

So...I get it all back together and running and take it for a spin. I can get all the way to redline now but I still have a slight stutter/stumble at 7k-ish rpm. My next thought is to get back into the carbs and go one notch out on the needles (I THINK they are set in the middle of the range right now.) One notch out means more needle sticking through the jet which means less fuel...right? Also, the needles are what control midrange and main jets are top end, right?

User avatar
CMSMJ1
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 7152
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:42 am
Bike owned: NC30-No9
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom

Re: Quick carb question

Post by CMSMJ1 » Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:08 am

Yes

Though I see it is part throttle =needles - the slides are not fully retracted

full throttle - main jets as the needles are full out of the way..
IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM

The V4 is the law..

NC30 - No9 - my old mate

Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954

Re: Quick carb question

Post by Neosophist » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:15 pm

Good to hear that it is nearly sorted. Sounds like your right on the money too.

This flat spot is quite common and well talked about as you've no doubt read about in countless posts over the years.

It's usually caused by the bike being too lean in the midrange.

(As for your last question, The midrange circuit is the needle and throttle plate and slide in combo, this controls the change from the slow jet to the main jet. normally you only adjust the needle, but can change the spring / hole size in the slides too.)

Raise the needle via a shim (Rick-O sells pre-made ones), or in your case as you have adjustable needles, start by movning the clip down a notch on all the needles.

This will shorten / raise the needle. Now it will come out of the needle holder sooner, thus allowing more fuel into the engine and hopefully smooth out the lean spot.

It's usually always caused by the bike being too lean in this area, so lowering the clip / raising the needles should be the way to go.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...

User avatar
vfrman
Senior Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:54 pm
Bike owned: NC30, 1098s
Location: Layton, Utah, USA

Re: Quick carb question

Post by vfrman » Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:07 pm

So you think it is too lean?

Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954

Re: Quick carb question

Post by Neosophist » Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:18 pm

vfrman wrote:So you think it is too lean?
I'd say its too lean at that point. All of them i've seen have been lean there. (transition) which is why you get the flat spot. You'll soon know if its too lean by changing the needles, should help it.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...

User avatar
vfrman
Senior Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:54 pm
Bike owned: NC30, 1098s
Location: Layton, Utah, USA

Re: Quick carb question

Post by vfrman » Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:06 pm

I'll give that a go tomorrow....maybe. LOL.

User avatar
vfrman
Senior Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:54 pm
Bike owned: NC30, 1098s
Location: Layton, Utah, USA

Re: Quick carb question

Post by vfrman » Sat Jan 05, 2013 7:10 pm

OK, on your advice I went one notch down on the needles to bring them out of the jets more. I took the bike for a quick run around the block a couple times and it was running much better. I had it stumble just once at around 12k. Kind of odd. I was at WOT so maybe the fuel tap was restricting fuel. Hard to tell. I might just get it on a dyno now for the fine tuning. I pulled the rear plug before messing with the carbs, and this is what it looked like.

Image

I also pulled it after the tuning and it pretty much looked the same. If anything, it might still be a tad lean....

Neosophist
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 8172
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:01 pm
Bike owned: CBR954

Re: Quick carb question

Post by Neosophist » Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:40 am

They look good to me!

I think you could get away with running 120's all around but depends on if you want to go through the hassle of faffing around changing jets.

Doubt your peak power will change but it might feel a little crisper if its slightly lean at the top end, dyno run will tell you more though.
xivlia wrote:i dont go fast on this bike so really do not need a rear brake.. /
vic-vtrvfr wrote:Ask xivlia for help, he's tackled just about every problem u could think of...

User avatar
vfrman
Senior Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:54 pm
Bike owned: NC30, 1098s
Location: Layton, Utah, USA

Re: Quick carb question

Post by vfrman » Sun Jan 06, 2013 1:39 pm

Ironically there were 120s all around to begin with. I wonder what would happen with a 120/122 setup. I just need to get it on a Dyno now.

Post Reply