Valve clearances second opinion

Forum rules
Please can you post items for sale or wanted in the correct For Sale section. Items / bikes for sale here will be removed without warning. Reasons for this are in the FAQ. Thanks
Post Reply
User avatar
ibby4585
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 2315
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:42 pm
Bike owned: SP's
Location: oxfordshire

Valve clearances second opinion

Post by ibby4585 » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:44 pm

Right ive just done the clearances on my 1991 red/black NC30 with 71K on the clock.

these are the results

Valve clearances!!

All checked and all just within the tolerances.

cylinder 1 inlets 0.12 and 0.13 outlets 0.23 and 0.21
cylinder 3 inlets 0.12 and 0.13 outlets 0.23 and .021
cylinder 2 inlets 0.13 and 0.13 outlets 0.23 and 0.23
cylinder 4 inlets 0.13 and 0.13 outlets 0.23 and 0.23


All fairly close but thought I would leave alone, your thoughts??

Ta
Kris

User avatar
porndoguk
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 3293
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:17 pm
Bike owned: NC30
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Re: Valve clearances second opinion

Post by porndoguk » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:27 pm

be different kris and change them like 10mm each way and have an engine sound like you have a bag of spanners!

the CBR125R i have, has a recomened gap of inlet 0.06mm and outlet 0.27mm

inlet is about 7mm and outlet is 0.35mm ish

no wonder it ran like and sounded like a dog, ill get this tuned up when my new tappets arrive ;)

and plenty of other DS Spares
NC30 & NC23 33BHP Restrictors For Sale
£25 Inc P&P and donation to 400GB PM for more details


http://www.bikerstraining.com

Like us on Facebook for more information - First Bike on Scene - Emergency Response Skills - UK

User avatar
micpec
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 9:11 pm
Bike owned: NC35’s, NC30 sold, MC34 many
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Valve clearances second opinion

Post by micpec » Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:33 am

Kris, there is nothing wrong with those measurements. You can just leave it as is albeit a bit on the "tight" side.

(I rather focus on the middle of both min/max areas...inlet 0.15 and outlet 0.24...while the engine is opened for measurements I thought I might as well adjust it).
"Action without Philosophy is a lethal weapon; Philosophy without action is worthless"

User avatar
ibby4585
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 2315
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:42 pm
Bike owned: SP's
Location: oxfordshire

Re: Valve clearances second opinion

Post by ibby4585 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:40 am

Cheers Jas. If I was keeping it I would loosen them a bit! But it's getting sold so trying to keep the costs down!

It's amazing how everything adds up! I don't want to make a massive profit on it just enough to cover my costs!!

Kris

User avatar
CMSMJ1
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 7152
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:42 am
Bike owned: NC30-No9
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom

Re: Valve clearances second opinion

Post by CMSMJ1 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:23 am

If you are getting rid, then leave them. Personally I go for slightly larger than the middle range of tolerances but that is just me..

If they are in spec then the bike is a doozy..all good. I doubt anyone off here would have any issues buying it after all the effort you have put in.

Saying that...I want to see the biggest HRC blag HRC blag advert going and see if you can convince anyone that it is a one off, owned by the Emperor of Japan etc... :grin:
IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM

The V4 is the law..

NC30 - No9 - my old mate

User avatar
ibby4585
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Posts: 2315
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:42 pm
Bike owned: SP's
Location: oxfordshire

Re: Valve clearances second opinion

Post by ibby4585 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:57 am

Mark there will be HRC galore in the Ad! I'm hoping for 5grand!! :grin:

Kris

Post Reply